↓ Skip to main content

The hardiness of liquids

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The hardiness of liquids
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, August 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41568-020-0296-4
Authors

Ulrike Harjes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#9,496,585
of 17,055,082 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#1,634
of 2,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,094
of 303,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,055,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.