| Title |
Energy storing bricks for stationary PEDOT supercapacitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-17708-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongmin Wang, Yifan Diao, Yang Lu, Haoru Yang, Qingjun Zhou, Kenneth Chrulski, Julio M. D’Arcy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 255 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 8% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| Japan | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% |
| Egypt | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 134 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 218 | 85% |
| Scientists | 30 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 21% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 26 | 16% |
| Engineering | 24 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 15% |
| Energy | 5 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#12,992
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#251
of 58,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#629
of 427,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#13
of 1,515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.