| Title |
Neonicotinoids and decline in bird biodiversity in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-0582-x |
| Authors |
Yijia Li, Ruiqing Miao, Madhu Khanna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 562 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 53 | 9% |
| United States | 48 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 6% |
| Japan | 34 | 6% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| Canada | 11 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| Belgium | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 6% |
| Unknown | 310 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 504 | 90% |
| Scientists | 43 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 962. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,515
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#22
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#786
of 427,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 125.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.