| Title |
Early treatment-related neutropenia predicts response to palbociclib
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-020-0967-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas P. McAndrew, Mark A. Dickson, Amy S. Clark, Andrea B. Troxel, Mark H. O’Hara, Christopher Colameco, Maryann Gallager, Kristi Gramlich, Kelly Zafman, David Vaughn, Gary K. Schwartz, Peter J. O’Dwyer, Angela DeMichele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,208,145
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#8,851
of 10,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,136
of 396,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#73
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.