↓ Skip to main content

Crystal symmetry breaking and vacancies in colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Crystal symmetry breaking and vacancies in colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots
Published in
Nature Materials, June 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmat4661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Bertolotti, Dmitry N. Dirin, Maria Ibáñez, Frank Krumeich, Antonio Cervellino, Ruggero Frison, Oleksandr Voznyy, Edward H. Sargent, Maksym V. Kovalenko, Antonietta Guagliardi, Norberto Masciocchi

Abstract

Size and shape tunability and low-cost solution processability make colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots (QDs) an emerging class of building blocks for innovative photovoltaic, thermoelectric and optoelectronic devices. Lead chalcogenide QDs are known to crystallize in the rock-salt structure, although with very different atomic order and stoichiometry in the core and surface regions; however, there exists no convincing prior identification of how extreme downsizing and surface-induced ligand effects influence structural distortion. Using forefront X-ray scattering techniques and density functional theory calculations, here we have identified that, at sizes below 8 nm, PbS and PbSe QDs undergo a lattice distortion with displacement of the Pb sublattice, driven by ligand-induced tensile strain. The resulting permanent electric dipoles may have implications on the oriented attachment of these QDs. Evidence is found for a Pb-deficient core and, in the as-synthesized QDs, for a rhombic dodecahedral shape with nonpolar {110} facets. On varying the nature of the surface ligands, differences in lattice strains are found.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 34%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 66 33%
Materials Science 41 21%
Physics and Astronomy 28 14%
Engineering 12 6%
Chemical Engineering 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,478,808
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1,758
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,784
of 368,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.