↓ Skip to main content

Rapid isolation of rare targets from large fluid volumes

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Rapid isolation of rare targets from large fluid volumes
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-69315-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Niklas Hedde, Margaux Bouzin, Timothy J. Abram, Xiaoming Chen, Melody N. Toosky, Tam Vu, Yiyan Li, Weian Zhao, Enrico Gratton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#10,801,758
of 18,496,698 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#49,099
of 99,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,406
of 305,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,496,698 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.