| Title |
Digitizing clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-020-0302-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. T. Inan, P. Tenaerts, S. A. Prindiville, H. R. Reynolds, D. S. Dizon, K. Cooper-Arnold, M. Turakhia, M. J. Pletcher, K. L. Preston, H. M. Krumholz, B. M. Marlin, K. D. Mandl, P. Klasnja, B. Spring, E. Iturriaga, R. Campo, P. Desvigne-Nickens, Y. Rosenberg, S. R. Steinhubl, R. M. Califf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% |
| Germany | 5 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 64% |
| Scientists | 23 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 389 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 169 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 78 | 20% |
| Unknown | 186 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#455,359
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#142
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,604
of 405,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.