| Title |
SARS-CoV-2 failure to infect or replicate in mosquitoes: an extreme challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-68882-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan-Jang S. Huang, Dana L. Vanlandingham, Ashley N. Bilyeu, Haelea M. Sharp, Susan M. Hettenbach, Stephen Higgs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 982 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 167 | 17% |
| Spain | 138 | 14% |
| United States | 61 | 6% |
| Mexico | 19 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 2% |
| Japan | 13 | 1% |
| Colombia | 11 | 1% |
| Peru | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 94 | 10% |
| Unknown | 450 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 872 | 89% |
| Scientists | 70 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,800
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#55
of 142,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226
of 414,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 3,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.