↓ Skip to main content

Forum: CRISPR roundtable with Doudna and Liu

Overview of attention for news story in Nature Biotechnology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Forum: CRISPR roundtable with Doudna and Liu
Published by
Nature Biotechnology, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41587-020-0619-8
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,470,625
of 16,760,518 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#4,616
of 7,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,574
of 291,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#76
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,760,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.