| Title |
The ethics of deferred consent in times of pandemics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-020-0999-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rieke van der Graaf, Marie-Astrid Hoogerwerf, Martine C. de Vries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,809,441
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#4,397
of 9,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,876
of 432,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#101
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.