| Title |
A user guide for the online exploration and visualization of PCAWG data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-16785-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary J. Goldman, Junjun Zhang, Nuno A. Fonseca, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano, Qian Xiang, Brian Craft, Elena Piñeiro-Yáñez, Brian D. O’Connor, Wojciech Bazant, Elisabet Barrera, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer, Robert Petryszak, Anja Füllgrabe, Fatima Al-Shahrour, Maria Keays, David Haussler, John N. Weinstein, Wolfgang Huber, Alfonso Valencia, Peter J. Park, Irene Papatheodorou, Jingchun Zhu, Vincent Ferretti, Miguel Vazquez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,658,189
of 24,076,257 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,296
of 51,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,576
of 400,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#748
of 1,512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,076,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.