Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures

@moxfactor @Milton99993 @luo_yuehan Actually, I probably know more than you on this topic since this is my job. By the way, this is your saying. https://t.co/VMPBY0lN2d

@mattyglesias Three-mile island did not kill zero people. This is a myth that is contradicted by the actual evidence. The myth is based on modeling, which itself is based on flawed assumptions. The actual data explodes this myth, as does this paper. https

@Milton99993 @luo_yuehan you think regular nuclear reactor waste water is the same as a meltdown? please to live in Chernobyl and drink the water there. plenty of cheap land there to do as you please. or how about Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania? https

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

RT @HeidiHutner: Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @Stric…

Cape Cod, Fukushima, it’s everywhere. One more thing people don’t know about the nuclear story…. And take a peak at @StrictlyNormal’s paper on Shot Noise and xenon releases from nuclear power plants. This new study begins https://t.co/av3c3dvPcJ. https://

RT @tlarson95425: So if anyone can read this and work up a response to it, that would be great. The Radioactive Women of TMI documentary re…

RT @therealrthorat: @daniel_corcos @TweetOfSteiner @JulieMFaenza @KathrynTewson @annateresa79 @JJGass @BeecherDenys @Blue_Mage @questauthor…

@daniel_corcos @TweetOfSteiner @JulieMFaenza @KathrynTewson @annateresa79 @JJGass @BeecherDenys @Blue_Mage @questauthority @Too_Big_To_Fail @sfmnemonic @PGtzsche1 https://t.co/Moszx0w4Y2

So if anyone can read this and work up a response to it, that would be great. The Radioactive Women of TMI documentary relies almost entirely on this umm study... a few cogent sentences would help us all out if and when it comes to your town. #nuclear ht

@ethrop @McFarlandAuthor You are looking at a bare surface. You have to consider that conclusive cytogenetic studies were not done by US. Why? Otherwise, like all forms of pollution, when people sick/die, causal links hard to make see: https://t.co/qrxAK9y

@KarlAlexPauls @AngelicaOung @HeidiHutner I said to myself "self, what would Karl Pauls do?" and bingo! https://t.co/Z8esoV8CtX

デイツマン論文使えるかな https://t.co/EzUmQs9RS4

RT @yunusunbabasi: Radiobiological shot noise explains #ThreeMileIsland biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/yyg…

Radiobiological shot noise explains #ThreeMileIsland biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/yygZNaoS2h

@NucSafetyUCS This is the new finding. We've actually begun the biodosimetric investigation I recommended should be done in the article. https://t.co/rSQ4sCzKMx

⚛️💀💀 Nature: https://t.co/izw7gs41Pb "Moreover, if the conventional understanding that no one was harmed by the Three Mile Island accident is incorrect—as it happens, due to the failure to apply elementary calculus— 1/2

@Aaron_PE_ @ArnieVT @NSVann @BeyondNukesInt @NoNukesIP @stop_cpv @agreenewyork @nirsnet @mzjacobson @dorfman_p @howarth_cornell @PaulBlanch8 @beyondnuclear2 @kgo81 @MichaelEMann @BobCohen1 @sukihd 1/ You might want to read https://t.co/3T1OCeVI4y. Datesman

getting over the pro nuke biased propaganda is the first step...

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

RT @Unplugnukes: Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary…

Came across this peer reviewed study in Nature while battling a pro-nuclear troll who’s afraid to see the new documentary “Radioactive: The Women of Three Mile Island.” It backs up the claims of TMI downwinders that they received huge doses of radiation. h

@roottothejesse https://t.co/bgVLFUP8SK

@russellh777 Do you need me to explain the big words in this peer reviewed article? Put simplyYou’re wrong. There’s ample evidence of genetic damage saying the downwinders received huge doses. You’re part of a cover up of the truth that’s been going on for

@russellh777 The gasses in the containment building were vented to prevent an explosion. That released radiation into the environment. If you’ve really been “studying it since it happened,” why do I have to explain this to you? https://t.co/bgVLFUP8SK

@OpinionsGiven @SlartyBardfast9 @Bowenchris Actually the damage is still being scientifically evaluated https://t.co/29m1kw0qf1

デイツマンさんが、スリーマイルの時のキセノン１３３をクローズアップしたのもこの意味ではなかったのか？ https://t.co/EzUmQsqUU4 ペンシルベニア州のスリーマイル島原子力発電所での1979年の事故により、約2,200万キュリーのキセノン133が環境に放出されました。

RT @rz733375: 内部被ばくによるベータ線被ばくは、一般に考えられているよりもはるかに危険である可能性がある。この発見は、保健物理学の分野では革命的なものになるかもしれない。 さらにこのネイチャー論文に続きます。 https://t.co/EzUmQsqUU4 スリ…

RT @rz733375: 内部被ばくによるベータ線被ばくは、一般に考えられているよりもはるかに危険である可能性がある。この発見は、保健物理学の分野では革命的なものになるかもしれない。 さらにこのネイチャー論文に続きます。 https://t.co/EzUmQsqUU4 スリ…

内部被ばくによるベータ線被ばくは、一般に考えられているよりもはるかに危険である可能性がある。この発見は、保健物理学の分野では革命的なものになるかもしれない。 さらにこのネイチャー論文に続きます。 https://t.co/EzUmQsqUU4 スリーマイル島のバイオダイナミクスを説明し、約1000mSvの被ばく

Let us amplify those voices of truth from #3mileisland incident. The radiation released was higher than acknowledged. The health effects worse than published.https://t.co/TPdN9E5vSX

こちらネイチャー　サイエンスリポート https://t.co/EzUmQs9RS4 放射線生物学的ショットノイズは、スリーマイル島の生物線量測定を説明し、1,000mSv近くの被ばくを示しています アーロン・M・デイツマン

The US defense is responsible for a worldwide cover-up. 1/2

@daniel_corcos @simon_gordon_ @mattwridley I know the author of these two papers. He's a really smart guy and his arguments are convincing. https://t.co/O7j4h3vdaf https://t.co/Moszx0w4Y2

https://t.co/vOXMgkCmzp

RT @Luissilv2000: @elsbtmar me sorprende y lo voy a ver por q siempre se ha reportado q no hubo mayores consecuencias con emision d radiaci…

RT @Luissilv2000: @elsbtmar me sorprende y lo voy a ver por q siempre se ha reportado q no hubo mayores consecuencias con emision d radiaci…

RT @Luissilv2000: @elsbtmar me sorprende y lo voy a ver por q siempre se ha reportado q no hubo mayores consecuencias con emision d radiaci…

@elsbtmar me sorprende y lo voy a ver por q siempre se ha reportado q no hubo mayores consecuencias con emision d radiacion por esta ser muy baja… sin embargo… este articulo en Nature reta esa aseveración en terminos d niveles d exposicion mayores y sus ef

この論文を引用したネイチャー論文でとんでもないものが出てきました。 なんとあのスリーマイルの実際の内部被ばく量か https://t.co/EzUmQs9RS4 スリーマイル島原子力発電所での1979年の事故により、約2,200万キュリーのキセノン133が環境に放出されました。

RT @yunusunbabasi: 'Three Mile Island' kazasında çevreye 22 milyon küri radyoaktif xenon-133 izotopu yayılmış. Bu makale yayılan bu radyoak…

'Three Mile Island' kazasında çevreye 22 milyon küri radyoaktif xenon-133 izotopu yayılmış. Bu makale yayılan bu radyoaktif gazın etkilerinin şimdiye kadar söylenenden/bilinenden çok daha ciddi olabileceğine işaret ediyor: https://t.co/XcH7j74b8R

@FareedZakaria You need to study this article, TMI was not death free! People, cows suffered! https://t.co/Q4bqUwzqRv

@FareedZakaria (I like your show). While the conventional belief is that no one was harmed by exposure to ionizing radiation due to the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, actually the most comprehensive epidemiological evidence...

Otro ejemplo aún más reciente “Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures”. Datesman. 2020. https://t.co/bQu4NddsdS

RT @nebulousmenace: @m_older Just to make your day worse: have you seen @StrictlyNormal 's article suggesting a mechanism for the cancer sp…

RT @nebulousmenace: @m_older Just to make your day worse: have you seen @StrictlyNormal 's article suggesting a mechanism for the cancer sp…

@m_older Just to make your day worse: have you seen @StrictlyNormal 's article suggesting a mechanism for the cancer spikes around TMI and implying that radiation is a lot more damaging than thought? https://t.co/ZWkVHbK3Q5

@VictoriaLBruce The nuclear science community had a chance to demonstrate its wisdom in the wake of the Three Mile Island accident. Would your conviction change if you understood they got the story wrong by orders of magnitude? https://t.co/rSQ4sCzKMx

@EdPheil @JenniLynneFord1 @HeidiHutner @NucSafetyUCS @simonahac @Joffan7 @lohud @TimMousseau2 Pleased to make your acquaintance, Ed. I was at Bettis for a while in 2005. Might we have crossed paths? Anyway, with your technical background you will have no

@JenniLynneFord1 @HeidiHutner @NucSafetyUCS @simonahac @Joffan7 @EdPheil @lohud @TimMousseau2 I am a NASA and DOE scientist who published a long article in the open-access literature at his own expense. In what way exactly am I not helping to educate the p

@JenniLynneFord1 @HeidiHutner @NucSafetyUCS @simonahac @Joffan7 @EdPheil @lohud @TimMousseau2 I don't do Twitter feuds, but I do publish my opinions in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. https://t.co/rSQ4sCzKMx

RT @HeidiHutner: @Cecalli_Helper @EdPheil @NucSafetyUCS @lohud You might want to see this important new study on Three Mile. Changes the ga…

@Cecalli_Helper @EdPheil @NucSafetyUCS @lohud You might want to see this important new study on Three Mile. Changes the game. https://t.co/qrxAK9ykB3

@bluejohnnyd @VictoriaLBruce @JodyCoyote12 The conventional understanding of TMI health effects is hugely wrong. Promoting my own work is a touch crass, but, this is why: https://t.co/rSQ4sCzKMx

“The Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island... asserted that any health or medical impacts affecting the population living within twenty miles of the accident site were due to mental distress.” https://t.co/qMJKzvQ3bZ

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…

RT @rwerkh: Datesman, A.M. Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures. Sci Re…

"radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly underestimated for 42 yrs!" #ThreeMileIsland nuclear accident @Nukleeralaturka

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @majianadesan: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/G5s…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

Datesman, A.M. Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures. Sci Rep 10, 10933 (2020). https://t.co/sVR04zGiZf

OH Hi Helen Caldicott!

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

RT @fairewinds: New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly unde…

New scientific paper in prestigious journal, @nresearchnews, shows that radiation exposures from #TMI meltdown grossly underestimated for 42 yrs! Paper proves exposures actually 100+x higher than NRC admits! We believe Chernobyl/Fukushima likely similar! h

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…

RT @arclight2011: "a fundamental error in the health physics body of knowledge: the defin. of the energy imparted to tissue, ε, fails to pr…

"a fundamental error in the health physics body of knowledge: the defin. of the energy imparted to tissue, ε, fails to properly acct for the temporal distribution of ionization products resulting from dilute contamination with an internally incorporated be

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…

RT @DrHCaldicott: Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures https://t.co/jbh…