| Title |
The Contribution of Oculomotor Functions to Rates of Visual Information Processing in Younger and Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-66773-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deena Ebaid, Sheila G. Crewther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 43% |
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,647,547
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#29,416
of 125,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,881
of 400,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,021
of 3,858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.