| Title |
Distinct synchronization, cortical coupling and behavioral function of two basal forebrain cholinergic neuron types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-020-0648-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamás Laszlovszky, Dániel Schlingloff, Panna Hegedüs, Tamás F. Freund, Attila Gulyás, Adam Kepecs, Balázs Hangya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 59% |
| Scientists | 29 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 24% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 64 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 17% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#779,533
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,369
of 5,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,647
of 435,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#37
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.