| Title |
A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-020-0832-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erwei Zuo, Yidi Sun, Tanglong Yuan, Bingbing He, Changyang Zhou, Wenqin Ying, Jing Liu, Wu Wei, Rong Zeng, Yixue Li, Hui Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#803,605
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,047
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,697
of 396,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#28
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.