↓ Skip to main content

A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects
Published in
Nature Methods, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41592-020-0832-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erwei Zuo, Yidi Sun, Tanglong Yuan, Bingbing He, Changyang Zhou, Wenqin Ying, Jing Liu, Wu Wei, Rong Zeng, Yixue Li, Hui Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#583,086
of 19,247,573 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#806
of 4,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,190
of 296,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#27
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,247,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.