| Title |
Complement genes contribute sex-biased vulnerability in diverse disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2277-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria J. Arranz, Steven Bakker, Stephan Bender, Elvira Bramon, David A. Collier, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Jeremy Hall, Conrad Iyegbe, Assen V. Jablensky, René S. Kahn, Luba Kalaydjieva, Stephen Lawrie, Cathryn M. Lewis, Kuang Lin, Don H. Linszen, Ignacio Mata, Andrew M. McIntosh, Robin M. Murray, Roel A. Ophoff, Jim Van Os, John Powell, Dan Rujescu, Muriel Walshe, Matthias Weisbrod, Durk Wiersma, Peter Donnelly, Ines Barroso, Jenefer M. Blackwell, Elvira Bramon, Matthew A. Brown, Juan P. Casas, Aiden Corvin, Panos Deloukas, Audrey Duncanson, Janusz Jankowski, Hugh S. Markus, Christopher G. Mathew, Colin N. A. Palmer, Robert Plomin, Anna Rautanen, Stephen J. Sawcer, Richard C. Trembath, Ananth C. Viswanathan, Nicholas W. Wood, Chris C. A. Spencer, Gavin Band, Céline Bellenguez, Peter Donnelly, Colin Freeman, Eleni Giannoulatou, Garrett Hellenthal, Richard Pearson, Matti Pirinen, Amy Strange, Zhan Su, Damjan Vukcevic, Cordelia Langford, Ines Barroso, Hannah Blackburn, Suzannah J. Bumpstead, Panos Deloukas, Serge Dronov, Sarah Edkins, Matthew Gillman, Emma Gray, Rhian Gwilliam, Naomi Hammond, Sarah E. Hunt, Alagurevathi Jayakumar, Jennifer Liddle, Owen T. McCann, Simon C. Potter, Radhi Ravindrarajah, Michelle Ricketts, Avazeh Tashakkori-Ghanbaria, Matthew Waller, Paul Weston, Pamela Whittaker, Sara Widaa, Christopher G. Mathew, Jenefer M. Blackwell, Matthew A. Brown, Aiden Corvin, Mark I. McCarthy, Chris C. A. Spencer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 363 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 7% |
| Japan | 11 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| India | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 137 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 198 | 55% |
| Scientists | 133 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 6% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#99,563
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,861
of 98,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,711
of 419,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#224
of 930 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 930 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.