↓ Skip to main content

Innovations in approaches to remove uraemic toxins

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Nephrology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Innovations in approaches to remove uraemic toxins
Published in
Nature Reviews Nephrology, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41581-020-0299-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalinde Masereeuw, Marianne C. Verhaar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,541,167
of 17,053,340 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#790
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,443
of 283,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,053,340 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.