@giorgiogilestro Still more reliable than the several papers linking the origin of SARS-Cov-2 to pangolins, published by Nature and then withdrawn because of lack of data and ambiguities. Lab leaks are not uncommon events at all, why should we ignore this
Isolation of SARS-CoV-2-related coronavirus from Malayan pangolins | Nature https://t.co/uTYFUaglDt
RT @gasolineface: @KatzOnEarth @BretWeinstein @joerogan There are multiple genetic smoking guns to suggest the virus was not of natural ori…
RT @gasolineface: @KatzOnEarth @BretWeinstein @joerogan There are multiple genetic smoking guns to suggest the virus was not of natural ori…
@KatzOnEarth @BretWeinstein @joerogan There are multiple genetic smoking guns to suggest the virus was not of natural origin and yet you still continue to run interference for the CCP. https://t.co/gUWT6wlI4x https://t.co/1h5RGTtGdt
@skysword77777 @Laurie_Garrett @NIHDirector There is not zero evidence of zoonotic transmission. “The pangolin-CoV-GDC has 100%, 98.6%, 97.8% and 90.7% amino acid identity with SARS-CoV-2 in the E, M, N and S proteins, respectively.” https://t.co/JytWtxwxE
@realeggrage @KeironKeironmh @suzseddon @WakenWilla https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7 The virus was isolated a year ago. If you don't think this method of isolation is valid, please provide a link to a reputable scientific publication that explains why.
@BennyDRasmussen @richienrg @Debunk_the_Funk https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7 If you don't agree with this, feel free to publish your objections in a reputable publication.
@rch371 1) while the author seems to suggest that the potential host species has not been (and not been able to be) identified, it was suggested from very early on that, based on RNA analysis, pangolin is the likely candidate. https://t.co/LGXJOU3UGg https
RT @TheSeeker268: 8/ And there are a lot of legit questions about the GD pangolin CoV that still has not been answered more than a year aft…
RT @Ayjchan: @franciscodeasis @KamounLab Don't even know when "Appropriate editorial action will be taken once this matter is resolved." ht…
@franciscodeasis @KamounLab Don't even know when "Appropriate editorial action will be taken once this matter is resolved." https://t.co/YxGABC1uyZ https://t.co/boFxY2K3f3
@Ilona11367836 @pjvanerp @veen_els @JJansen038 Ongeveer al een jaar geleden geïsoleerd….. je moet wel bij blijven hoor https://t.co/iupaQ5pPhv
@DollaRich1 I could show you a study where they isolated a virus, but I guarantee that you would just claim, without any scientific source, that the methodology was illegitimate. https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7
@IndependentRe17 @GillianMcKeith @QJ62746826 If you believe that, then please explain, with scientific sources, why you believe the results here are not legitimate: https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7
@CalvinPerrins @EmmaBur48725555 @CraigMirage "Plus no virus has ever been isolated " https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7 Bull.
@r_hartman @MartinThePracEd @ChrisMasseyFOIs “NO virus has EVER been isolated.” Nonsense. https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7 https://t.co/A9RnzXsKH1 https://t.co/XT5Ss2fN2R
@kingkevin3333 @DickPower369 @Valkyrie20201 https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7 You’re full of shit
@TravelLightP1 He’s explain, in detail and with citations, why you believe this paper to be illegitimate: https://t.co/Ayz2pCs7i7
@tijoalca Got to stay out of trouble for a bit... would help a lot if @nature journal would correct their paper sooner. More than five months after Editor's Note added, still no correction. https://t.co/YxGABC1uyZ
@stgoldst @K_G_Andersen @Tantalite @FrancescoEsp33 https://t.co/pYzq1d5pi0 So sorry @Ayjchan the experts consider your pangolins still extremely suspicious 😁
RT @TheSeeker268: 8/ And there are a lot of legit questions about the GD pangolin CoV that still has not been answered more than a year aft…
RT @TheSeeker268: 8/ And there are a lot of legit questions about the GD pangolin CoV that still has not been answered more than a year aft…
With some computer manipulations, it should not be so difficult to find a pangolin coronavirus that matches better than the junk published in Nature, for which an Editor alert is posted since 5 months.
@stgoldst @K_G_Andersen @Tantalite @FrancescoEsp33 Pangolins carry CoV too distant from SARS2 to be considered the direct source. https://t.co/HK4vzhy3mt Only one sample had that special RBD similar to SARS2, but it is under scrutiny https://t.co/Vi21EOVV
@stgoldst @K_G_Andersen @Tantalite @FrancescoEsp33 @Rossana38510044 Sure Stephen.. Hopefully Nature also agrees.. https://t.co/NBanbXSnoq https://t.co/bCfvmftPzF
@BartonMarks @shermham @K_G_Andersen @FrancescoEsp33 @edwardcholmes I for one do have immense respect for journals such as Nature.. That said, take a look at the editor's note on this nature paper (paper published in May '20 while editor's note appeared in
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @TheSeeker268: 8/ And there are a lot of legit questions about the GD pangolin CoV that still has not been answered more than a year aft…
8/ And there are a lot of legit questions about the GD pangolin CoV that still has not been answered more than a year after being published. https://t.co/awWuds0UkZ
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
Grateful to Dr. Chan for putting together such detailed threads tracking the major issues and inconsistencies surrounding what is publicly known about the origins of SARS CoV 2 and research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Grateful to have a trustworthy
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
Xiao et al. 2020 @nature "obtained the lung tissues from 4 Chinese pangolins (Manis pentadactyla) and 25 Malayan pangolins (Manis javanica).. March–August 2019.. virus-positive Malayan pangolins were all from the first transport" https://t.co/YxGABC1uyZ
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
RT @Ayjchan: Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong p…
Several scientists are reasonably curious about what the issues are with most prominent papers describing the same Guangdong pangolin CoV that shares a very similar spike RBD with SARS2. On Nov 11, @Nature put an editor's note on one of these papers... ht
RT @Rossana38510044: @ydeigin @lab_leak "However, a virus related to pangolin-CoV appears to have DONATED the RBD to SARS-CoV-2" https://t.…
@ydeigin @lab_leak "However, a virus related to pangolin-CoV appears to have DONATED the RBD to SARS-CoV-2" https://t.co/Vi21EPdvWR How generous is that? 😂
Good summary, thanks. We, born skeptics, are still awaiting the position of Nature about the pangolin paper, that has an "editors note" dated 11th november 2020. https://t.co/2BlRABe9Pw
@BillyBostickson @Greg21143362 @edwardcholmes @ericpanzer @jw_mike @amymaxmen It was written for its intended audience; I felt confident that Holmes could follow the argument. But, I pulled my info from: Rambaut - https://t.co/6La5TPL0FS Frutos - https://
RT @Ayjchan: @seachange_au @nature @shingheizhan If you mean about the Nature pangolin CoV paper, an editor's note was put up and @Nature i…
@loewenbaby37 @martin_phillip_ https://t.co/olUaHYmJV8 Das habe ich noch vergessen. https://t.co/10X90ZWj8r
SARS 286 page 29 https://t.co/reA6VlHHR4
@code__green @robinmonotti CSCL gradient is a common lab technique to purify viruses from Vero cells. See https://t.co/q38yBNU4WK
@yervandkarapet @DoctorLunge @robinmonotti Adenovirus are routinely purified in the lab using CSCL gradient. Maybe not be detailed in the paper. https://t.co/q38yBNU4WK
@DoctorLunge @robinmonotti Suspect this has been done. CSCL gradient common technique to purify viruses. https://t.co/q38yBNU4WK
@robinmonotti Not sure Sam is correct about this. See this paper. A tissue homogenate prepared & then used it to inoculate Vero cells. Then use a CSCL gradient to purify the virus from culture. This is routinely done to purify adenovirus constructed in
RT @angoffinet: Great finds by Drastic about Pangolin coronavirus sequence editions. https://t.co/kgy8xvOr0E Authors never answered my ema…
RT @angoffinet: Great finds by Drastic about Pangolin coronavirus sequence editions. https://t.co/kgy8xvOr0E Authors never answered my ema…
RT @angoffinet: Great finds by Drastic about Pangolin coronavirus sequence editions. https://t.co/kgy8xvOr0E Authors never answered my ema…
Great finds by Drastic about Pangolin coronavirus sequence editions. https://t.co/kgy8xvOr0E Authors never answered my email queries about their Nature paper. https://t.co/2BlRABe9Pw This has not been retracted. Only a "Editorial note" from 11 november 2
And the other group of authors @nature who published the same Guangdong pangolin CoV sequence built primarily with the same dataset as the @PLoSPathogens group - still don't know when the correction will be made despite 101K article accesses... https://t.c
@wrobel_antoni @PDBeurope Also, and this is not your fault at all, but are you aware that these 2 papers from which you obtained the Guangdong pangolin sequence suffer from data issues? @nature added an Editor's Note to their Xiao et al. paper https://t.c
@RizaPutranto Kalo yg dari Trenggiling Malaysia gmn om? Katanya 91.02% identik... Bahas juga dong 🙏 https://t.co/EUIgW21o2f
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Lo que varios virólogos, biólogos han dicho. Este virus nunca ha sido aislado de un ser humano, ni tampoco replicado.. S…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Lo que varios virólogos, biólogos han dicho. Este virus nunca ha sido aislado de un ser humano, ni tampoco replicado.. S…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Lo que varios virólogos, biólogos han dicho. Este virus nunca ha sido aislado de un ser humano, ni tampoco replicado.. S…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Lo que varios virólogos, biólogos han dicho. Este virus nunca ha sido aislado de un ser humano, ni tampoco replicado.. S…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…
RT @Crossfit_Alma: Acá la verdad para que usted entienda. El virus nunca se ha aislado de un ser humano, lo que han hecho es comparar el co…