| Title |
Age and Species Comparisons of Visual Mental Manipulation Ability as Evidence for its Development and Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-64666-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hrag Pailian, Susan E. Carey, Justin Halberda, Irene M. Pepperberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| Japan | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 75% |
| Scientists | 14 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#281,574
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,261
of 142,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,334
of 415,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#90
of 3,376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.