| Title |
Quantification of tRNA fragments by electrochemical direct detection in small volume biofluid samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-64485-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hazel McArdle, Marion C. Hogg, Sebastian Bauer, Felix Rosenow, Jochen H. M. Prehn, Kellie Adamson, David C. Henshall, Elaine Spain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,121,092
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#19,206
of 139,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,622
of 387,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#517
of 3,362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.