| Title |
Souporcell: robust clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data by genotype without reference genotypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-020-0820-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haynes Heaton, Arthur M. Talman, Andrew Knights, Maria Imaz, Daniel J. Gaffney, Richard Durbin, Martin Hemberg, Mara K. N. Lawniczak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 17% |
| Germany | 7 | 7% |
| Canada | 6 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 62 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 39 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 336 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 93 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#371,281
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#427
of 5,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,064
of 413,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#8
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.