↓ Skip to main content

Identification of disease-specific motifs in the antibody specificity repertoire via next-generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Identification of disease-specific motifs in the antibody specificity repertoire via next-generation sequencing
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep30312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Pantazes, Jack Reifert, Joel Bozekowski, Kelly N. Ibsen, Joseph A. Murray, Patrick S. Daugherty

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Chemical Engineering 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,804,094
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#37,067
of 125,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,031
of 368,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,060
of 3,688 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,688 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.