↓ Skip to main content

Editorial Expression of Concern: Quantized Majorana conductance

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
30 tweeters
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Editorial Expression of Concern: Quantized Majorana conductance
Published in
Nature, April 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2252-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Zhang, Chun-Xiao Liu, Sasa Gazibegovic, Di Xu, John A. Logan, Guanzhong Wang, Nick van Loo, Jouri D. S. Bommer, Michiel W. A. de Moor, Diana Car, Roy L. M. Op het Veld, Petrus J. van Veldhoven, Sebastian Koelling, Marcel A. Verheijen, Mihir Pendharkar, Daniel J. Pennachio, Borzoyeh Shojaei, Joon Sue Lee, Chris J. Palmstrøm, Erik P. A. M. Bakkers, S. Das Sarma, Leo P. Kouwenhoven

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 40%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#296,014
of 19,508,584 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,967
of 84,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,875
of 289,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#442
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,508,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.