↓ Skip to main content

A competing-risks model explains hierarchical spatial coupling of measles epidemics en route to national elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A competing-risks model explains hierarchical spatial coupling of measles epidemics en route to national elimination
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1186-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max S. Y. Lau, Alexander D. Becker, Hannah M. Korevaar, Quentin Caudron, Darren J. Shaw, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Bryan T. Grenfell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Mathematics 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#449,955
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#805
of 2,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,210
of 406,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#30
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.