↓ Skip to main content

A competing-risks model explains hierarchical spatial coupling of measles epidemics en route to national elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A competing-risks model explains hierarchical spatial coupling of measles epidemics en route to national elimination
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1186-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max S. Y. Lau, Alexander D. Becker, Hannah M. Korevaar, Quentin Caudron, Darren J. Shaw, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Bryan T. Grenfell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Mathematics 2 9%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#314,418
of 21,355,489 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#606
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,790
of 296,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#23
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,355,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 152.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.