RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
A great analogy (along with a fantastic resource for comparing the minuscule SARS COV2 particles to others) — which along with all of the ‘real world’ studies makes a mockery of the ridiculous repressive face-mask psyops/theatre; akin to using a shopping b
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
@claire_horwell @AurtherSwindel1 Last link that helped me re-assess and I hope it helpful for you too.
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
RT @ClareCraigPath: Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X…
Burning wood = 0.2 - 3.0 microns Asbestos = 0.7 - 90 microns COVID aerosols 0.25-1.0 microns. https://t.co/3SjwS2VI8X https://t.co/rLT0l6M7tL How long would you be prepared to stay in this room? (You can wear your covid mask to keep you safe). https://t.
@Rich89564810 @renniecook Masks don't work so wouldn't help her anyway. https://t.co/pCmwX1tzRf
@Bob_Wachter @CDCgov Masks don't work https://t.co/pCmwX1tzRf
@DocP86497759 @CBCNews TrUsT tHe ScIeNcE - yOu DoNt NeEd DaTa!I’m not a sheep, thanks. Surgical masks protect you from particles 2.5 μm or larger. SARS-CoV-2 aerosols can be as small as 0.25 μm. Source: https://t.co/rg9agDkOSo
@ctvottawa Surgical masks protect you from particles 2.5 microns or larger. SARS-CoV-2 aerosol particles range anywhere from 0.25 to 2.5 microns. Masks do not work. https://t.co/rg9agDkOSo https://t.co/5gqUIfB2Yv
Report also says "...spread via aerosols, viral transmission via ... ) ref 5, 13 ,15 Ref 13 concludes SARS-CoV-2 may have the potential to be transmitted via aerosols https://t.co/tyxl06gJR6 Ref 15 advocates for N95 to cover all transmission routes https:/
@rmcsquared @AJfonzarelli @txwikinger_ea @gregggonsalves and soon after: SARS-CoV-2 may have the potential to be transmitted through aerosols... ventilation, open space, sanitization of protective apparel, and proper use and disinfection of toilet areas c
@SouthpawSBagger @bethanyshondark Idiocy. Masks don't work. Stop drinking the fear-mongering media kool-aid. https://t.co/xILqx7Qzmj https://t.co/pCmwX1tzRf https://t.co/vniTiYMoqg
RT @VocZj: 图1环时 24日新发病例 浦东机场货运区 进口业务 强调2次/周核算例检 20日还是阴性 图2 3 4 病毒学界文章 把15日北京(加拿大邮件)+17日深圳(北美快递冷冻试剂)+珠海流调 同一口径指向北美和境外 找了20年2月的Nature+NEJM两…
RT @VocZj: 图1环时 24日新发病例 浦东机场货运区 进口业务 强调2次/周核算例检 20日还是阴性 图2 3 4 病毒学界文章 把15日北京(加拿大邮件)+17日深圳(北美快递冷冻试剂)+珠海流调 同一口径指向北美和境外 找了20年2月的Nature+NEJM两…
RT @VocZj: 图1环时 24日新发病例 浦东机场货运区 进口业务 强调2次/周核算例检 20日还是阴性 图2 3 4 病毒学界文章 把15日北京(加拿大邮件)+17日深圳(北美快递冷冻试剂)+珠海流调 同一口径指向北美和境外 找了20年2月的Nature+NEJM两…
图1环时 24日新发病例 浦东机场货运区 进口业务 强调2次/周核算例检 20日还是阴性 图2 3 4 病毒学界文章 把15日北京(加拿大邮件)+17日深圳(北美快递冷冻试剂)+珠海流调 同一口径指向北美和境外 找了20年2月的Nature+NEJM两篇论文拼凑 Nature论文2月大爆发武汉取样环境 https://t.co/T94cJJNDEN https://t.co/nu7EwRlB8c
@daschani @CallmeChrisMa @GFoi https://t.co/UW52o7UeM4 https://t.co/P5y0dBEGEF Aerosole waren April 2020 schon unter Verdacht: https://t.co/bME1hsNukM
@RepKimSchrier @POTUS Do NOT mask kids. Masks don't work. Grow up and live with the virus that has a 99+% recovery rate for most people under 70 and is less deadlier than the flu. My God, quit making children suffer. https://t.co/pCmwX1bYsF https://t.co/
RT @ArturoS63455739: @Perbess No hace falta que sea fomites como tal para que esa posibilidad sea cierta. Se puede considerar la resuspensi…
RT @ArturoS63455739: @Perbess No hace falta que sea fomites como tal para que esa posibilidad sea cierta. Se puede considerar la resuspensi…
@Perbess No hace falta que sea fomites como tal para que esa posibilidad sea cierta. Se puede considerar la resuspensión de aerosoles, algo que por ejemplo poca gente ha comentado y/o estudiado. Curiosamente uno de los primeros papers de la pandemia lo sug
RT @secludingforce: @LinaHidalgoTX Masks don't work. https://t.co/xILqx7Qzmj https://t.co/pCmwX1tzRf https://t.co/vniTiYMoqg
@TomChivers @J_D_89 Sure WHO were running on their usual 12 months late timeline. But consensus was building around that time https://t.co/xHdubhzXKY which they would appear to be aware of otherwise they’d never go to the party? Imagine the apocalyptic fal
@LinaHidalgoTX Masks don't work. https://t.co/xILqx7Qzmj https://t.co/pCmwX1tzRf https://t.co/vniTiYMoqg
@LarsHJrgensen2 @JovoldEvenmo Driver du og tafser på lokket? Viktigere å ikke kaste aerosoler av virus folk kan puste inn ut i rommet, dette har man visst så og si hele pandemien, litt leit at det ikke har fått mer oppmerksomhet: https://t.co/BjIVQcTRg5
@bestbaldmanever @babymammoth_0 @GraceSeren May help a bit. Healthy lifestyle & washing hands are just as good a prevention. Most deaths occurred in elderly & obese, general health & care for elderly is more appropriate than a psychological dam
@nousaerons @gouvernementFR Avril 2020 https://t.co/uWeLG3UYpt
'The second round of sampling of total suspended particles in medical staff areas of Fangcang Hospital was conducted after the number of patients reduced from >200 to <100 per zone & the implementation of more rigorous & thorough sanitization
RT @ZittingUrsula: @merjah Hurjinta on kun ei edes yritetty oppia Kiinasta. Puhuivat jo alkukeväällä -20 aerosoleista, oireettomista tartun…
@merjah Hurjinta on kun ei edes yritetty oppia Kiinasta. Puhuivat jo alkukeväällä -20 aerosoleista, oireettomista tartunnoista, rajojen roolista. Ne oli ne megamokat. https://t.co/N464fU4uxl https://t.co/M8IH8i1vRI https://t.co/BwHUhib4xZ
"A year ago, there were so many mysteries about this disease" - @deonandan No - please don't rewrite the failure of health authorities to recognize the science, to make it sound like we didn't know. There were papers published in April 2020! https://t.co
@sirgetagrip @AngryMomUSA I could spend the next hour linking all sorts of data and studies showing they don’t work, but I’m not wasting my time. I’ll just leave this one. Good night. https://t.co/m4WhcQiUXI https://t.co/Igyrzks1ND
RT @riikka_kevo: Liu et al.🇨🇳 @Nature 27.4.2020 tutki #AerosolPitoisuus helmi-maalis 2020 kahdessa (2) eri #Wuhan_Sairaala täynnä #SARSCoV2…
Liu et al.🇨🇳 @Nature 27.4.2020 tutki #AerosolPitoisuus helmi-maalis 2020 kahdessa (2) eri #Wuhan_Sairaala täynnä #SARSCoV2-potilaita. JOS THL & STM olisi lukenut mm. näitä _kiinalaistutkimuksia_ joita minä heille lähetin 2020, olisiko #Suomi🇫🇮 terveem
@Kit_Yates_Maths 👏 👏 👏 👏 to the Telegraph for working this out. If only their investigative journalists had noticed all the scientific papers reporting #covidisairborne, like those linked in this thread, all from 2020. https://t.c
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 20/ So what about COVID? Is it also in such small aerosols? Well, in June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 wa…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
👇
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @MirrorManDan: People are dumb. If it's in aerosol virus, spit particles are Jack shit. But hey, pee analogies for the ignorant I gues…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
People are dumb. If it's in aerosol virus, spit particles are Jack shit. But hey, pee analogies for the ignorant I guess 🤷♂️
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…
RT @bigdave_006: @ifihadastick In June of 2020, it was published that SARS-CoV-2 was found in aerosols in the 0.2-0.5 micron range—10-25x s…