↓ Skip to main content

Questions of growth

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Questions of growth
Published in
Nature, December 2001
DOI 10.1038/414595a
Authors

Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Professor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 35%
Arts and Humanities 13 22%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#5,859,295
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#61,222
of 91,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,341
of 125,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#193
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.