| Title |
A genetic toolbox for marine protists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-020-0794-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew W. Brown, Alexander K. Tice |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 39 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 36 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 45% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#940,203
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,223
of 5,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,017
of 400,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#25
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.