RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
@tweettruth2me Read the article links in this tweet
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
Eh già
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
RT @ChanceGardiner: "Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (ve…
"Esperti" e politici non fanno che ripetere che "non è dimostrato che i VACClNl mRNA sono pericolosi". La Scienza (vera) dice che non devono essere gli altri a provarne la pericolosità, ma dovevano essere loro a dimostrarne la sicurezza a lungo termine,
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppar…
Dott. Doug Corrigan: Sarebbe bello se adottassero la stessa cautela sull'ADE come 16 anni quando tentarono di sviluppare i primi VACClNl contro la SARS. Questo articolo su Nature è del 2005. Ora, nascondono il potenziale rischio di ADE sotto il tappeto.
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
And we’re living the dystopian fallout warned about. Hubris in action.
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
מאמר ב Nature מ 2005 על חיסון לנגיף הסארס, די ברור שאם הכל היה שפוי מה שרוב המדענים היו עסוקים כיום האם אנו רואים ADE, ראו את התופעות אחד לאחד.
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
RT @ScienceWDrDoug: It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to…
It would be nice if they employed the same cautionary stance regarding ADE as they did 16 years ago when attempting to develop the first SARS vaccines. (This Nature article was written in 2005). Now, they sweep the potential risk of ADE under the rug. ht
@CopperScorpion @Stratscat @ironhealer @FairQuestions In 2005 mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated https://t.co/VihxVzmtVX and https://t.co/5muUwmBR3M
@HIMANSHU_FOLLOW https://t.co/J67Cu3ZOYZ Article explaining how ADE works in Sar-cov1: https://t.co/lPudrbSUaA https://t.co/lPudrbSUaA https://t.co/2ZTe8tBsQl
@corsair21c @echo_chamberz I assume mRNA is the magic that finally made a coronavirus vaccine possible. Combining these deadly technologies must fix both. Otherwise it wouldn't be safe and effective. https://t.co/w3UehnFbZz https://t.co/mfRXZQhnmh https:/
This explains a few things. From 2005 | Nature https://t.co/7Y9tWRWyxk
@chamchuk_nick @AndySwan @VivianneWolf Actually the spike protein vaccines cause the variants. It’s the vaccinated keeping this going. Here’s a scientific study from 2005 explaining this. https://t.co/CSje7F0xQP
A study in Nature from 2005 that says the problem with #spikeprotein vaccines is that while it might protect against one strain....it actually worsens #Infection against others! Evidence from #Israel and #UK, in particular with #Delta. https://t.co/bGvT
Study from 2005 https://t.co/KejaDFcjGD
This study sheds light on why it’s a BAD idea to use spike protein vaccines. Caution raised over SARS vaccine https://t.co/tEH9wOqDVI
2005 study on SARS vac and spike protein... "even worsen the infection" a preliminary study suggests. https://t.co/MOrEvcHUS2
If you haven't seen this study yet about the ineffectiveness of the mRNA jab, it's time to read it. https://t.co/SK4eroYWQp
@gred_vet @RobertoBurioni @borghi_claudio @Ariachetira @myrtamerlino Avevamo già imparato dagli errori: non è la prima volta che ci si trova a fronteggiare una SARS https://t.co/8DxQTt6n84
@PHE_uk https://t.co/C2CdfPaGjt They knew what could happen way back in 2005....Now the vaxx ed are paying the price...
Pearson, H. Caution raised over SARS vaccine. Nature (2005). https://t.co/otELmJKchT
@KikiwahT In 2004, attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets. https://t.co/8S7YnWlsQP -In 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated. •https://t.co/bigP33ls0M
RT @Gibbo50805625: @split_my @RWMaloneMD Disease and death. https://t.co/U5tqqSUhgG https://t.co/rtn4Vpkb8r https://t.co/OfmxncBsbx http…
RT @myrsmad: @mik3_mik3_mik3 @TommyMac501 @BNODesk You can read more about those risks I mentioned in those articles. Though one of them is…
@GeoffMiami Here is an article discussin spike protein technology that did just what she’s saying so in that case the vaccine never got approval. https://t.co/qPw0FOLcgR
@mik3_mik3_mik3 @TommyMac501 @BNODesk You can read more about those risks I mentioned in those articles. Though one of them is of a previous SARS virus, it's nonetheless very up to date with the spike proteine based immunity that was researched back in the
@faktuellt @AgnesWold Man kan inte använda ordet “troligen” samtidigt som man påstår att något är “faktuellt inkorrekt”. Frågan besvaras inte. Se https://t.co/1BkzS8ugI3 och https://t.co/tAxI7S2Ww1
@cdm7rn @samaire_samaire @2beTammy Sars-Cov-1 had zero to do with the vaccines for Covid-19. Those vaccine tests went horribly wrong. https://t.co/XVXrDLJdko
ADE:n takia pieleen menneet eläinkokeet k-rokoteilla
RT @mia_miaq: @PJB43034868 @ClaphamWendy @DrJohnB2 @lifebiomedguru @FatEmperor Here are few failed animal trials coronavirus vaccines: ht…
RT @mia_miaq: @PJB43034868 @ClaphamWendy @DrJohnB2 @lifebiomedguru @FatEmperor Here are few failed animal trials coronavirus vaccines: ht…
RT @mia_miaq: @PJB43034868 @ClaphamWendy @DrJohnB2 @lifebiomedguru @FatEmperor Here are few failed animal trials coronavirus vaccines: ht…
@HuzzahHonzi @OscarCryptoCat @Oso2357657087 @catturd2 3) It's been a problem for years - https://t.co/e3krhqSh1w article from 2005.
RT @mia_miaq: @PJB43034868 @ClaphamWendy @DrJohnB2 @lifebiomedguru @FatEmperor Here are few failed animal trials coronavirus vaccines: ht…
Interesting, from 2005 - risk of vaccine making subsequent infections with different strains worse. https://t.co/O6PBnAf30w
RT @mia_miaq: @PlatinumMouse @RWMaloneMD But trial animals did die why they never succeeded with corona vax. So how would you what’s gonna…
2005: Some vaccines could prove useless against certain strains, or even worsen the infection, a preliminary study suggests. https://t.co/YpEvsYLfm1
Two studies were mentioned in the above tweet stating "became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated" https://t.co/cENY8VQZ0d
“Caution raised over SARS vaccine - Jab against one strain might worsen infection with others.“ 2005 https://t.co/uo04WX4AYT 👇
@BobSchaller @JamesMadigan @AlexBerenson @biainfection @JoeBiden @NIH Yes.. Anyway TW is a GREAT source 4 interesting scientific studies (which would otherwise be +difficult 2 know that they exist or where 2 look for them), if 1 follows the right people &a
RT @ErinforCT110: @JamesMadigan @AlexBerenson @biainfection Here’s the 2005 study reflecting that it made nice more susceptible to illness.…
@JamesMadigan @AlexBerenson @biainfection Here’s the 2005 study reflecting that it made nice more susceptible to illness. https://t.co/q6fd2ObSCB
RT @_cieloitalia: Cautela sollevata sul vaccino contro la SARS Helen Pearson Natura ( 2005 ) https://t.co/GIVHMXjRQN
RT @_cieloitalia: Cautela sollevata sul vaccino contro la SARS Helen Pearson Natura ( 2005 ) https://t.co/GIVHMXjRQN
RT @_cieloitalia: Cautela sollevata sul vaccino contro la SARS Helen Pearson Natura ( 2005 ) https://t.co/GIVHMXjRQN
RT @_cieloitalia: Cautela sollevata sul vaccino contro la SARS Helen Pearson Natura ( 2005 ) https://t.co/GIVHMXjRQN