↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive evaluation of complex polymicrobial specimens using next generation sequencing and standard microbiological culture

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Comprehensive evaluation of complex polymicrobial specimens using next generation sequencing and standard microbiological culture
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-62424-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Cummings, Daniel R. Hoogestraat, Sara L. Rassoulian-Barrett, Christopher A. Rosenthal, Stephen J. Salipante, Brad T. Cookson, Noah G. Hoffman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 25%
Engineering 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,355,615
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#28,646
of 93,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,719
of 278,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them