↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive evaluation of complex polymicrobial specimens using next generation sequencing and standard microbiological culture

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Comprehensive evaluation of complex polymicrobial specimens using next generation sequencing and standard microbiological culture
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-62424-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Cummings, Daniel R. Hoogestraat, Sara L. Rassoulian-Barrett, Christopher A. Rosenthal, Stephen J. Salipante, Brad T. Cookson, Noah G. Hoffman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Engineering 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,859,295
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#40,039
of 125,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,571
of 368,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,263
of 3,840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.