| Title |
Futile complete recanalization: patients characteristics and its time course
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-61748-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takaya Kitano, Kenichi Todo, Shinichi Yoshimura, Kazutaka Uchida, Hiroshi Yamagami, Nobuyuki Sakai, Manabu Sakaguchi, Hajime Nakamura, Haruhiko Kishima, Hideki Mochizuki, Masayuki Ezura, Yasushi Okada, Kazuo Kitagawa, Kazumi Kimura, Makoto Sasaki, Norio Tanahashi, Kazunori Toyoda, Eisuke Furui, Yuji Matsumaru, Kazuo Minematsu, Takeshi Morimoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,191,062
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#65,733
of 125,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,984
of 367,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,103
of 3,922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.