| Title |
The hidden potential of urban horticulture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Food, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s43016-020-0045-6 |
| Authors |
Jill L. Edmondson, Hamish Cunningham, Daniele O. Densley Tingley, Miriam C. Dobson, Darren R. Grafius, Jonathan R. Leake, Nicola McHugh, Jacob Nickles, Gareth K. Phoenix, Anthony J. Ryan, Virginia Stovin, Nick Taylor Buck, Philip H. Warren, Duncan D. Cameron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 17% |
| Canada | 10 | 8% |
| United States | 9 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 76% |
| Scientists | 19 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#63,773
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Nature Food
#38
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,184
of 405,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Food
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.