↓ Skip to main content

Survey data on factors that constrain the adoption of soil carbon enhancing technologies in Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Survey data on factors that constrain the adoption of soil carbon enhancing technologies in Ethiopia
Published in
Scientific Data, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0431-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilson M. Nguru, Stanley K. Ng’ang’a, Fekadu Gelaw, George M. Kanyenji, Evan H. Girvetz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,319,042
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#1,827
of 2,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,188
of 394,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#67
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.