@LajXtra Re: "I love the response of the author" You credulously fall for anything that suits your ideologically-motivated narrative. Those of us with prior knowledge of Scientific Reports have a pretty good idea of where this might go. https://t.co/I53
@BomenAchterhoek @BoswachterRob Een eerder paper van deze auteur over het onderliggende mechanisme stond in Nature, maar is door de redactie teruggetrokken omdat het bij nader inzien te slecht was: https://t.co/If3L20KWlr
@JonssonYvette Kanske värt att påpeka att studien drogs tillbaka av publikationen efter att peer-review fann att den förlitade sig på högst felaktiga antaganden som underminerade dess tillförlitlighet? Eller är det också ett led i nedtystningen? https://t
@doorzienigheid Retraction cause: https://t.co/7LBKsm0rZx
@Yukon68563348 مجلهاش که ساینتیفیک ریپورتز بود و ناشرش نیچر، این هم لینک مقالش: https://t.co/PNXPKsgHKc
@BulgariaDK @BetjentBent Ja links som dette.. Underligt hun ikke har lagt sit nyeste "research" et sted hvor det Peer reviewes https://t.co/NIx2hy4TKK
@mittdolcino @LucioMM1 @jacopogiliberto Certo che conosco lo studio di Valentina Zharkova (non "Zarchova"). Un bell'esempio didattico di uno studio falocco, basato su calcoli errati che ha addirittura costretto l'editore a ritirarlo. Bello vedere come la s
@veggie64_leslie Happens, Earth is a dynamic Planet and some believe she is alive. This is an interesting little fight: NB note the retraction that is based on this article. However does Jupiter affect the star/sun isn't stretching it a bit? https://t.co/3
@tarahaelle Scientific Reports is hit-or-miss, as usual. A classic example is them publishing a paper that violated basic orbital mechanics. Retracted. https://t.co/qUs1enh0pA… https://t.co/KRQVsVkbEd… https://t.co/yQg6FRwYQV… https://t.co/71UCFXOZcA h
@FieryFlier @curryja @ClimateOfGavin Re: "Note that your team is the one that has to retract papers." Huh? https://t.co/yvgrXn3B30 https://t.co/7yfRXSx1HS
@EtterWerner @cricar_ @FranzStirnimann @Knutti_ETH https://t.co/5tm7oVZh59 Eine Studie von Zharkova und ihrem Team musste kürzlich zurückgezogen werden, da sie mehrere Mängel aufwies und die Ergebnisse nicht robust waren.
@commonsense6789 @katemyoder It was retracted. So yeah. It is nonsense. Amazing that your common sense missed that. https://t.co/Ngk5OYjf0w
@commonsense6789 @katemyoder @KHayhoe It was retracted. Now THAT you cannot deny. https://t.co/Ngk5OYjf0w
@JonasSundstrm1 Läs kommentarerna från författarna beträffande tillbakadragandet nedan. Ett flagrant brott mot vetenskaplig praxis av tidningen att dra tillbaka en godkänd artikel pga irrelevanta invändningar från alarmistmaffian. https://t.co/Sr3j1EV88x
RT @iceagereentry: @GrizzlyGovFan her paper was retracted from Nature https://t.co/rx2hpRP3L7. she was late to the prediction game and hasn…
RT @iceagereentry: @GrizzlyGovFan her paper was retracted from Nature https://t.co/rx2hpRP3L7. she was late to the prediction game and hasn…
@Djent35 @Syzrgy101 @BradPope20 @EcoSenseNow @MichaelEMann Denialists are constantly getting debunked/disproven, regardless of what the BBC does: https://t.co/IpO336EeVX
@GrandSolarMin Check your facts - https://t.co/bL73L6qlQK A core assumption of the paper was incorrect.
@yota_berlin @Bill_In_DC @GrizzlyGovFan @Carbongate No reason? A core assumption of the paper was entirely wrong. https://t.co/bL73L6qlQK
"Retraction Note: Oscillations of the baseline of solar magnetic field and solar irradiance on a millennial timescale" https://t.co/M2CPFXnypg
@252Aegis Müsste es gewesen sein. War jedenfalls einer der Lieblingslinks von "Skeptikern" https://t.co/gfpQ4YJ0WE
@MJIBrown Zharkova's reply. https://t.co/515ygOBp4P
@sman_chris Zharkova's reply. https://t.co/515ygOBp4P
@EssaysConcern @theresphysics Zharkova's reply. https://t.co/515ygOSZWn
@JohnMashey @MicrobiomDigest @theresphysics Zharkova's reply. https://t.co/515ygOBp4P
@AndyOz2 See Zharkova's reply. https://t.co/515ygOBp4P
RT @Sustainable2050: Retraction note by @nature's Scientific Reports journal here: https://t.co/odOym45xBy One of the authors agrees with…
RT @Sustainable2050: Retraction note by @nature's Scientific Reports journal here: https://t.co/odOym45xBy One of the authors agrees with…
RT @Sustainable2050: Retraction note by @nature's Scientific Reports journal here: https://t.co/odOym45xBy One of the authors agrees with…
Retraction note by @nature's Scientific Reports journal here: https://t.co/odOym45xBy One of the authors agrees with the retraction, btw.
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL https://t.co/G2gqgwkKIO
RT @cosmos4u: When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et a…
RT @cosmos4u: When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et a…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL https://t.co/G2gqgwkKIO
RT @pikarl: „papers should only be retracted in extreme circumstances, but it was warranted in this case due to fundamental errors“
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL https://t.co/G2gqgwkKIO
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @cosmos4u: When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et a…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL https://t.co/G2gqgwkKIO
One for the "it's the sun wot did it" nutters.
RT @cosmos4u: When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et a…
RT @pikarl: „papers should only be retracted in extreme circumstances, but it was warranted in this case due to fundamental errors“
RT @cosmos4u: When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et a…
When climate science deniers get basic celestial mechanics wrong (and then refuse to learn it) ... the infamous Zharkova et al. paper has finally been retracted by the journal Scientific Reports: https://t.co/gmEO2NHqvC -> https://t.co/uoOdocxX2B and ht
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
@PolAnimalAus @Aequita67250433 @Twitter @adapt2030 Re: "I did a search but did not see a retraction by Zharkova?" It's retracted now. https://t.co/I53knqqWZL https://t.co/71UCFXOZcA https://t.co/iggNyY2Pzm
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
@TFL1728 The paper has been pulled, not because of the magnetic field hypothesis, or the cycle data, but a mere conjecture on the cause. Retraction Note: Oscillations of the baseline of solar magnetic field and solar irradiance on a millennial timescale
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Remember all those stories about supposedly imminent mini-ice ages recently? These are the researchers and this was the…
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL
"… inaccurate because the motions of the Earth and the Sun are primarily due to Jupiter and the other giant planets, which accelerate the Earth and the Sun in nearly the same direction, and thereby generate highly-correlated motions in the Earth and Sun."
4d/C Re: "[on a future solar minimum] Zharkova et al.'s nonsense on this is being unraveled" Their paper was retracted, as it should be and as @theresphysics called for months ago https://t.co/qUs1enh0pA https://t.co/IDqWGT4wBS https://t.co/PlMIZv4zLx
@GarethSJones1 @TimOsbornClim That was a long thread (amazing, tgey cited Akasofu😊) but see the outcome. Dr Zharkova still disagrees. @theresphysics https://t.co/ZhjGcr6qwJ
RT @ClimateOfGavin: Retraction notice here: https://t.co/KTcTyLeTCL https://t.co/G2gqgwkKIO
RT @GabeFilippelli: A ludicrous study claiming that global warming was caused by changes in Earth’s distance to the Sun was published in a…