| Title |
Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: Public and private sector roles. A multiple case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dana Lee Olstad, Kim D Raine, Linda J McCargar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,668,054
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,261
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,561
of 182,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.