| Title |
Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Discovery, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41421-020-0147-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanan Cao, Lin Li, Zhimin Feng, Shengqing Wan, Peide Huang, Xiaohui Sun, Fang Wen, Xuanlin Huang, Guang Ning, Weiqing Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 509 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 16% |
| Turkey | 35 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 5% |
| Japan | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Mongolia | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 54 | 11% |
| Unknown | 277 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 447 | 88% |
| Scientists | 46 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 215 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 141 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 76 | 6% |
| Other | 278 | 22% |
| Unknown | 327 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 237 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 230 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 75 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 3% |
| Other | 228 | 18% |
| Unknown | 382 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#42,750
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cell Discovery
#3
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,345
of 385,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Discovery
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.