↓ Skip to main content

Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cardiology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
90 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
Title
Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia
Published in
Nature Reviews Cardiology, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41569-020-0341-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Dewey, Maria Siebes, Marc Kachelrieß, Klaus F. Kofoed, Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Konstantin Nikolaou, Wenjia Bai, Andreas Kofler, Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke, Amedeo Chiribiri, Tobias Schaeffter, Florian Michallek, Frank Bengel, Stephan Nekolla, Paul Knaapen, Mark Lubberink, Roxy Senior, Meng-Xing Tang, Jan J. Piek, Tim van de Hoef, Johannes Martens, Laura Schreiber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 73 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 31%
Engineering 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Physics and Astronomy 9 4%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 82 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#510,791
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#80
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,648
of 368,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.