Title |
Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Cardiology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41569-020-0341-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marc Dewey, Maria Siebes, Marc Kachelrieß, Klaus F. Kofoed, Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Konstantin Nikolaou, Wenjia Bai, Andreas Kofler, Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke, Amedeo Chiribiri, Tobias Schaeffter, Florian Michallek, Frank Bengel, Stephan Nekolla, Paul Knaapen, Mark Lubberink, Roxy Senior, Meng-Xing Tang, Jan J. Piek, Tim van de Hoef, Johannes Martens, Laura Schreiber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 16% |
Germany | 11 | 12% |
United States | 7 | 8% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 4% |
Switzerland | 4 | 4% |
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Cyprus | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 2 | 2% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 56% |
Scientists | 15 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 245 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
Other | 52 | 21% |
Unknown | 73 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 31% |
Engineering | 24 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 13% |
Unknown | 82 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#510,791
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#80
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,648
of 368,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.