| Title |
Resource use by individual Drosophila suzukii reveals a flexible preference for oviposition into healthy fruits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-59595-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renate Kienzle, Lara B. Groß, Shelby Caughman, Marko Rohlfs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,169,303
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#48,526
of 127,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,274
of 362,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,632
of 4,137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.