| Title |
Genetic basis for iMCD-TAFRO
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oncogene, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41388-020-1204-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihide Yoshimi, Tanya M. Trippett, Nan Zhang, Xueyan Chen, Alexander V. Penson, Maria E. Arcila, Janine Pichardo, Jeeyeon Baik, Allison Sigler, Hironori Harada, David C. Fajgenbaum, Ahmet Dogan, Omar Abdel-Wahab, Wenbin Xiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 87% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,350,287
of 24,723,421 outputs
Outputs from Oncogene
#2,047
of 10,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,597
of 467,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncogene
#17
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,723,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.