| Title |
Understanding decision making in a food-caching predator using hidden Markov models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40462-020-0195-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad S. Farhadinia, Théo Michelot, Paul J. Johnson, Luke T. B. Hunter, David W. Macdonald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Greece | 1 | 10% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 10% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,651,169
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#175
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,934
of 455,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.