| Title |
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Lähnemann, Johannes Köster, Ewa Szczurek, Davis J. McCarthy, Stephanie C. Hicks, Mark D. Robinson, Catalina A. Vallejos, Kieran R. Campbell, Niko Beerenwinkel, Ahmed Mahfouz, Luca Pinello, Pavel Skums, Alexandros Stamatakis, Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini, Samuel Aparicio, Jasmijn Baaijens, Marleen Balvert, Buys de Barbanson, Antonio Cappuccio, Giacomo Corleone, Bas E. Dutilh, Maria Florescu, Victor Guryev, Rens Holmer, Katharina Jahn, Thamar Jessurun Lobo, Emma M. Keizer, Indu Khatri, Szymon M. Kielbasa, Jan O. Korbel, Alexey M. Kozlov, Tzu-Hao Kuo, Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt, Ion I. Mandoiu, John C. Marioni, Tobias Marschall, Felix Mölder, Amir Niknejad, Alicja Rączkowska, Marcel Reinders, Jeroen de Ridder, Antoine-Emmanuel Saliba, Antonios Somarakis, Oliver Stegle, Fabian J. Theis, Huan Yang, Alex Zelikovsky, Alice C. McHardy, Benjamin J. Raphael, Sohrab P. Shah, Alexander Schönhuth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 475 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 134 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 8% |
| Australia | 32 | 7% |
| Germany | 20 | 4% |
| Spain | 11 | 2% |
| France | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 60 | 13% |
| Unknown | 147 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 274 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 189 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1563 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 344 | 22% |
| Researcher | 235 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 156 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 121 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 4% |
| Other | 188 | 12% |
| Unknown | 461 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 422 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 188 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 107 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 4% |
| Engineering | 52 | 3% |
| Other | 219 | 14% |
| Unknown | 508 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#124,978
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#29
of 4,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,259
of 476,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.