| Title |
Reconstructing evolutionary trajectories of mutation signature activities in cancer using TrackSig
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14352-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yulia Rubanova, Ruian Shi, Caitlin F. Harrigan, Roujia Li, Jeff Wintersinger, Nil Sahin, Amit G. Deshwar, Quaid D. Morris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,901,796
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,379
of 58,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,348
of 478,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#720
of 1,431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.