Title |
Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-13824-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lina Sieverling, Chen Hong, Sandra D. Koser, Philip Ginsbach, Kortine Kleinheinz, Barbara Hutter, Delia M. Braun, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano, Ruibin Xi, Rolf Kabbe, Peter J. Park, Roland Eils, Matthias Schlesner, Benedikt Brors, Karsten Rippe, David T. W. Jones, Lars Feuerbach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 21% |
Germany | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
Egypt | 2 | 5% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 53% |
Scientists | 12 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 63 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
Other | 44 | 15% |
Unknown | 78 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 11% |
Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 7% |
Unknown | 89 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#683,132
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,763
of 55,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,869
of 463,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#321
of 1,429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.