| Title |
The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14369-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian J. Enquist, Andrew J. Abraham, Michael B. J. Harfoot, Yadvinder Malhi, Christopher E. Doughty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 14% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 52% |
| Scientists | 71 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 20% |
| Researcher | 45 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#163,005
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,318
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,216
of 476,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#45
of 1,431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.