| Title |
Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4649-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Waldron, Tracey Carr, Linda McMullen, Gill Westhorp, Vicky Duncan, Shelley-May Neufeld, Lori-Ann Bandura, Gary Groot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Norway | 3 | 9% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Morocco | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,454,786
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#451
of 8,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,741
of 480,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#12
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.