| Title |
The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1476-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nivantha Naidoo, Van Thu Nguyen, Philippe Ravaud, Bridget Young, Philippe Amiel, Daniel Schanté, Mike Clarke, Isabelle Boutron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 46 | 39% |
| France | 12 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 58% |
| Scientists | 34 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#107,337
of 25,249,294 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#104
of 3,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,488
of 471,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,249,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.