| Title |
Vitamin D Supplementation in Overweight/obese Asian Indian Women with Prediabetes Reduces Glycemic Measures and Truncal Subcutaneous Fat: A 78 Weeks Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial (PREVENT-WIN Trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-56904-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Surya Prakash Bhatt, Anoop Misra, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Seema Gulati, Namrata Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| India | 2 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Romania | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 79 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,738,035
of 23,642,687 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,096
of 127,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,542
of 459,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#549
of 4,310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,642,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.