| Title |
Warming of hot extremes alleviated by expanding irrigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-14075-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wim Thiery, Auke J. Visser, Erich M. Fischer, Mathias Hauser, Annette L. Hirsch, David M. Lawrence, Quentin Lejeune, Edouard L. Davin, Sonia I. Seneviratne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 12% |
| Belgium | 8 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 57% |
| Scientists | 24 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 22% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 57 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 78 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#207,965
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,975
of 56,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,025
of 472,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#57
of 1,438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.