↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Ozone Removal by Spent Coffee Grounds

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Ozone Removal by Spent Coffee Grounds
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-56668-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pei-Fu Hsieh, Tsrong-Yi Wen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 24 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,152,116
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#89,398
of 126,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,167
of 457,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,054
of 4,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.