↓ Skip to main content

High-sensitivity intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid–laden plaque with a collinear catheter design

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
High-sensitivity intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid–laden plaque with a collinear catheter design
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep25236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingchun Cao, Jie Hui, Ayeeshik Kole, Pu Wang, Qianhuan Yu, Weibiao Chen, Michael Sturek, Ji-Xin Cheng

Abstract

A highly sensitive catheter probe is critical to catheter-based intravascular photoacoustic imaging. Here, we present a photoacoustic catheter probe design on the basis of collinear alignment of the incident optical wave and the photoacoustically generated sound wave within a miniature catheter housing for the first time. Such collinear catheter design with an outer diameter of 1.6 mm provided highly efficient overlap between optical and acoustic waves over an imaging depth of >6 mm in D2O medium. Intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid-laden atherosclerotic plaque and perivascular fat was demonstrated, where a lab-built 500 Hz optical parametric oscillator outputting nanosecond optical pulses at a wavelength of 1.7 μm was used for overtone excitation of C-H bonds. In addition to intravascular imaging, the presented catheter design will benefit other photoacoustic applications such as needle-based intramuscular imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 35%
Physics and Astronomy 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Chemistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#205,015
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,395
of 123,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,268
of 299,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#69
of 3,150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.