↓ Skip to main content

Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftiapachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftiapachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents
Published in
Nature, May 2001
DOI 10.1038/35075063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam G. Marsh, Lauren S. Mullineaux, Craig M. Young, Donal T. Manahan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Brazil 7 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 223 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 22%
Student > Bachelor 49 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 51%
Environmental Science 35 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 39 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,603,127
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,974
of 91,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,258
of 40,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#225
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.